I'd like to see some layouts that trigger this behavior. I tested many different cases, including components out of order, and haven't seen any of these kinds of problems. What container are you testing on?
-Ben On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, KR <k-no-s...@a4consulting.nl> wrote: > I've build the current 1.5.x branch (Revision 1236) and made it available > for download here: > > http://kdeveloper.com/stripes-1-5-4-beta/ > > I've also run it agains my current applications template and the current > beta does not seem to work correctly (or my templates need to be adjusted > for the new version). Some templates result in endless loops > (stackoverflow), while others are rendered incorrectly (wrong order of > layouts and some rendered multiple times). > > Karen > > > "Seth Duda" <sethd...@gmail.com> wrote in > message news:aanlktinj5vlw8k2_ndfu_ivbcyomj5lqrhoi7loij...@mail.gmail.com. > .. > > I've built and run the 1.5.x branch against my applications ( Currently > on > > Stripes 1.5.3 ) running on Tomcat 5.5.27 & 6.0.26. I've run through a few > > tests and they appear to be working great. I haven't taken a look at the > > memory usage, but from the end user's perspective, all of our screens > seem > > to be loading and functioning fine. > > > > Seth > > > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Ben Gunter > > <gunter...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I just committed the changes to the 1.5.x branch. I'd like this to > >> undergo > >> some serious testing so anybody who is able, please build from SVN and > >> test > >> in your existing applications or test setups. I've done some basic tests > >> and > >> have tested it in my application, and it works really well for me. Let > me > >> know how it goes for you. Thanks! > >> > >> -Ben > >> > >> > >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Ben Gunter > >> <gunter...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Sorry to truncate your thorough response, but I just wanted to let > >>> anyone > >>> who is interested know that I think I have managed to make the layout > >>> tags > >>> stream output directly to the client instead of buffering it and then > >>> dumping the whole thing at once. This should eliminate the possibility > >>> of a > >>> memory leak. I will, of course, need people to test the new code. I'll > >>> apply > >>> it to the 1.5.x branch tomorrow and let everyone know when it's ready > to > >>> test. > >>> > >>> -Ben > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Nikolaos Giannopoulos < > >>> nikol...@brightminds.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Richard (and Ben), > >>>> > >>>> Appears like a lot of good work has gone into trying to resolve / fix > >>>> this.... > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for the info. I hope my comments in-line can assist.... > >>>> > >>>> --Nikolaos > >>>> > >>>> <snip> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Stripes-users mailing list > >> Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users > >> > >> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Stripes-users mailing list > > Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Stripes-users mailing list > Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Stripes-users mailing list Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
