On 08/16/2011 04:09 PM, Cefn Hoile wrote: > Poitras Christian<Christian.Poitras@...> writes: > > However, whilst I can see there's a good argument for _not_ considering all > GET > and POST parameters to be owned by Stripes, (on the submission side) I don't > see > the argument for a tag like<@s.text name="design.featureDesign" /> not to > log a > severe error when Stripes can't bind the corresponding name while > introspecting > the ActionBean (on the forms generation side).
Stripes does not now that this field has been generated by stripes. It just generates a simple <input type="text" name="design.featureDesign" /> and may automatically add the value="" attribute as well from your actionBean. Varies ways to solve this problem come to mind, for example stripes could prepend a "magic string" to every generated field or another field containing metadata could be appended, but none of that sounds clean, nor simple to me. Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Stripes-users mailing list Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
