>I was thinking that anopther method, like execute() could just throw
>exception and be called by the ActionServlet, and the perform() form
>would not be called at all. So, like, deprecate perform() in favor of
>execute() (or something), if we can get the controller to gracefully
>choose between them. But I'm not sure how that would work ;-)
what about introducing of additional configuration parameter for ActionServlet
in web.xml like:
<init-param>
<param-name>perform</param-name>
<param-value>true</param-value>
</init-param>
which should be set by all legacy applications and would cause perform()
to be executed. Otherwise - execute().
Dmitri Valdin
--
Diese E-Mail enth�lt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich gesch�tzte Informationen. Wenn
Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrt�mlich erhalten haben,
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das
unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender
immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or
distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
