Just trying to get an idea of the proposed (minimum) version of the various commons packages needed to build struts 1.1. Here's what I've got so far:
COMPONENT VERSION/CVS-TAG NEEDED TO BUILD commons-beanutils 1.3 struts-core commons-digester 1.1.1 struts-core commons-collections 2.0? struts-core commons-logging 1.0 struts-core commons-pool STRUTS_11? struts-example? commons-dbcp STRUTS_11? struts-example? commons-validator STRUTS_11? struts-example? commons-sandbox-services STRUTS_11? struts-example? My personal preference is to only use released components (i.e. ones with version numbers). But I understand that it may not be possible considering that some components are not yet released (and some are even in the sandbox). - Gidado > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:24 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Beta 1 update > > > +1, but if you can wait until after midnight (Pacific Time) > tonight, I'll > be able to get some more bug fixes done. > > I also did some fixes/enhancements in commons-beanutils over > the weekend, > which raises a point -- it would also be good to tag the > specific bits of > the Commons packages that you include in the beta with the same tag. > Since Martin has commit access on jakarta-commons, this shouldn't be a > problem. And, nobody should complain since CVS doesn't give a rip how > many tags there are (just don't create branch tags). > > Craig > > > On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:41:22 -0800 > > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Beta 1 update > > > > First of all, I sincerely apologise to you all for the > length of time it is > > taking to get Beta 1 out the door. Unfortunately, I managed > to get sick, and > > still haven't quite got back to full strength yet. > > > > A few things have happened since I tagged the CVS tree for Beta 1. > > > > 1) Craig has made a boatload of bug fixes to the code base. > > > > 2) Arron made some changes to the nested taglib which he > requested be > > included in Beta 1. > > > > 3) David made many changes to Validator and the way it > hooks into Struts. He > > also updated some of the files in CVS to tag them as part of Beta 1. > > > > 4) Rob is checking in UML diagrams as I write this. > > > > Given these changes, and especially given the > already-updated tags in CVS, I > > think it would make sense at this point to retag the entire > tree to pick up > > the latest of everything as Beta 1. This would give us a > better, stronger, > > first beta. I promise to complete the beta release process > in one phase this > > time, to avoid a repeat of the current situation. > > > > Is everyone OK with this approach? > > > > -- > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
