Subject: 1.1 new build needs setter for every getter? From: JDavids <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> === I used 1.1 beta, and other builds just fine.
Late builds throw an exception if there are no setters. Some of my beans/pages do not need a setter, only a getter. It throws no such method exception. I think it should not require a setter. We have 40 beans with lots of properties, but not all properties are updateable. Is it me? Do I need a dummy setter in case the field is read only? tia, Vic -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
