DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4776>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4776 ResponseUtils.filter() does not encode the apostrophe character ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-12 22:55 ------- You are completely and utterly wrong. I'm not sure how else I can put it really. Have you actually read this bug report, because you certainly don't understand it. It is entirely false to say that it 'breaks compliance' with the spec. Why do you think that? Could you point to the part of the spec says that using entities in tag attribute values is non-compliant? You are also looking at a part of the spec that is completely irrelevant to this issue. What has whether or not the apostrophe character has a *named* entity got to do with anything? My patch uses a numeric entity. You tell me to 'calm down' and then make a completely bizarre, uninformed and incorrect claim without even reading the bug history. That's hardly going to help, is it? For chrissake, this is a 3-line patch, it fixes something that is demonstrably broken, it cannot possibly break any existing code, it is trivial to verify that the patch is correct, this bug report has been open for *nearly a year*, why on earth hasn't someone just checked it in? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
