Would it make any sense to copy forward and redirect tag to html, with the other 
struts-specifics, and deprecate 
the logic versions. Then if people are using JSTL, html might be the only taglib they 
need to import. 

10/15/2002 4:18:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
><http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13613>.
>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13613
>
>Logic ForwardTag does not support sub apps
>
>
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-15 20:18 -------
>I haven't verified that there is a bug here,
>but here are my thoughts.
>The patch provided:
>   // support sub-applications
>   if (config != null) {
>       path = config.getPrefix() + path;
>   }
>Always applies a prefix if config is != null.
>
>If config == null then there is probably something
>very wrong going on, since it this method goes to the trouble to
>look in the context if the initial config isn't found.
>
>The ForwardTag's code is a bit differnt than the
>ImgTag, ImageTag, or FormTag since they only look in the
>request.
>
>I'll take case of this when I refactor the fetching of the config
>and remove the if statement.
>
>-Rob
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to