Perhaps, the best place for that might be on the struts project at sf.net. http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/struts
At least that's where I'm planning to put a few things (such as DBMessageResources). Which reminds me Ted, what's the best way for me to maintain a subfolder off of the main site? http://struts.sourceforge.net/ James Mitchell Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist http://www.open-tools.org "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@;apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: config of struts with cactus] > > > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:10:11 -0800 (PST) > > From: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: config of struts with cactus] > > > > > > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:22:33 -0500 > > > From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: [Fwd: RE: config of struts with cactus] > > > > > > Heads up.... and I agree that bundling some kind of > > > Cactus/StrutsTestCase examples and perhaps even the API's themselves. > > > We all agree that writing test cases is a good thing, right? > So why not > > > help out the users of Struts with what we consider best > practices?! :) > > > > > > > +1 on the concept (as long as the code has compatible licenses, which is > > obviously the case for Cactus :-) -- I'm afraid I don't have > time to help > > on the mechanics. > > On the license topic ... > > Cactus is obviously compatible, because it uses the same license as Struts > (Apache). StrutsTestCase is LGPL, which would create a problem for > inclusion in an Apache distribution. *Using* Apache-licensed and LGPL > code together is perfectly fine -- the issues are around redistribution. > > Craig > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
