DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054 Rename "Application" components to "Module" ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-18 02:38 ------- > Why doesn't PlugInPatch extend PlugIn? For Compatability. Eventually PlugIn will have the new method signiture. The old method will be deleted. >I don't see anything wrong with changing the PlugIn >I think we're going overboard on this. > I don't like the idea of having these conversion artifacts hanging > around when we haven't even released the first version of plugins. I waffled as to wheather we should break backwards compatability, After Craig explained it was because of our Designation of Beta, there better be a pretty good reason for breaking compatability. We promised backwards compatability and I agree that for 1.1 that is the way it needs to be. Once we go to the 1.2, 1.2.1 etc like Ant then we can adopt an new policy. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
