I don't really *need* this feature personally, so I'm probably not justified in submitting an enhancement request. If I do decide to develop a module as part of my sample application, I'll try switching from *.do to /do/* and then log a bug if I feel it's necessary.
Thanks, Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:19 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Module path-mapping limitation > > > > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matt Raible wrote: > > > Is there a bug that I can reference (in my writing) for the > limitation > > that modules can only be used with extension-mapping (*.do) rather > > than path-mapping (/do/*)? > > I don't see a bug report for that in Bugzilla, so feel free > to submit an enhancement request. It is still an open issue. > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > > > > If this has been fixed, please let me know. > > > > Matt > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > additional commands, > e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
