Each issue in a Release Plan is decided by Lazy Majority, so it's up for someone to veto. (Release Plans are "line-item" documents.)

http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html

"Release Plan

"A release plan is used to keep all volunteers aware of when a release is desired, who will be the release manager, when the repository will be frozen to create a release, and other assorted information to keep volunteers from tripping over each other. Lazy majority decides each issue in a release plan. "

Personally, I'd like to try and lock this down so that next milestone can be a release candidate, but everything depends on what comes in "over the transom" once its released =:(

-Ted.

Eddie Bush wrote:
I don't really think we need a revote, but if others do you can count in my +1. At this stage, I'm all for marking new bugs as LATER for the "next release" (whether that be a beta or final). By all means, let's try to knock out the bugs we can between now and the time the beta is cut, but let's cut it none-the-less.

(What is the next milestone we're aiming for? 1.1-final? 1.1-beta-4?)

Peace

Martin Cooper wrote:

On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote:

Ok, I'll update the Roadmap and the B3 plan with the appropriate
queries, and add a box next to the bugs we are swatting to indicate
their status. This will at least make the static list easier to maintain
=:0)

I just updated the site with your updated release plan. Given that the
plan has changed from what people voted on, do we need to ((re-)re-)vote
on the updated release plan? <sigh/> I hope not, but I fear so.

FYI, we had 9 +1/+0 responses and no -1/-0 responses, so 9 committers
responding out of 14 currently listed.

--
Martin Cooper





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to