I wouldn't have a problem with taking a recent nightly build and
declaring it RC1. Is this the way we want to go?
James Turner
Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author:
MySQL & JSP Web Applications:
Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
ISBN 0672323095; SAMS, 2002
Co-Author:
Struts Kick Start
ISBN 0672324725; SAMS, 2002
Forthcoming:
Java Server Faces Kick Start
SAMS, Fall 2003
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David M. Karr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 3:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Declare Struts 1.1b3 as Struts 1.1 RC1
>
>
> >>>>> "David" == David M Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> Is there an easy way to get the diffs or comments
> of all elements with commits
> David> since the 1.1b3 tagging?
>
> If it's useful, I figured out how to get the diffs listing,
> at least, with:
>
> cvs rdiff -rSTRUTS_1_1_B3 jakarta-struts
>
> I still don't know how to get the commit comments listing,
> but that is less important, if we can see the diffs listing.
>
> Considering the output I get from this, and approximately 50
> commits since 1.1b3 (according to Martin), I think using the
> 1.1b3 tag is not advisable. I can't judge whether having 21
> open bugs is meaningful, as I'm sure some fraction of those
> will be unresolvable, or not practical to fix in the 1.1 timeframe.
>
> --
> ===================================================================
> David M. Karr ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; SCJP; SCWCD
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:struts-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For
> additional commands,
> e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
