David
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Axis4Struts package names
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:05:37 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:23:39 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Axis4Struts package names
>
>
>
> I guess even though some of the code will be run in Axis and some will be
> run in Struts there's no real requirement that the classes have to be in
> packages that reflect that.
>
> If the packages are to all live in org.apache.struts then maybe Mark's idea
> is good:
>
> org.apache.struts.axis
>
> Adopting a "org.apache" name may seem presumptuous - but if the Struts
> developers don't mind having this project use org.apache.struts.axis (or
> org.apache.struts.anything...) then that's probably as good as anything.
>
I thought the convention for SF-based Java projects was net.sf.<package>
or something like that?
If the code is later migrated into Struts and/or Axis, package names
changes are pretty trivial, and shouldn't require fixing anything more
than some import statements.
> Comments?
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
