Can anybody comment on whether this patch would be useful (maybe an
enhancement in 1.2)?  I agree with Ted that it runs counter to the concept
of modules, but I seem to remember seeing a few other questions about this
on the user list.  I think some resources (images in particular) are truly
shared resources even when you are using modules.
Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:02 PM
To: John Espey
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16571] - Error in documentation for
html:img tag.


You'd have to bring that up on the DEV list. I believe the way modules
work now, the expectation would be for the default to be module
relative. The current implementation of modules presumes everything
within each module is distinct and not shared, and the module-relative
default is consistent with the rest of the current implementation.

-Ted.

John Espey wrote:
> Ted,
> Thanks for the follow up.  Would you be opposed to a contextRelative
> attribute that defaulted to false?  Just curious, I'll take a crack at a
> patch if you don't have a serious issue with it.
> Thanks
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16571] - Error in documentation for html:img
> tag.
>
>
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16571>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16571
>
> Error in documentation for html:img tag.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>              Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |FIXED
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-02-04
18:13 -------
> Given the current module paradigm, the default should be module-relative.
If
> you
> need your modules to share resources, you might want to consider using
> multiple
> struts-configs without modules instead.
>
>


--
Ted Husted,
Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to