DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16776>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16776 Add paramValue attribute to <html:link> tag [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-04 23:51 ------- True, but I don't consider that acceptable, for three reasons: 1) It requires that I create a <forward> just to add a static parameter to a link (which I don't need to do for a dynamic parameter). 2) That <forward> must be *global*, negating any attempt at locality of reference. 3) The <forward> must "know" that I am using extension mapping. Given that I can do this to specify a parameter dynamically, from a bean: <html:link action="/MyAction" paramId="action" paramName="bean" ... > it makes perfect sense to me to be able to specify a parameter statically, like this: <html:link action="/MyAction" paramId="action" paramValue="edit" ... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
