Ok, I will patch this for monday with this option.

----- Message d'origine -----
De : "Edgar P. Dollin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
� : "'Struts Developers List'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoy� : vendredi 14 f�vrier 2003 18:00
Objet : RE: [Bug 12573] - Handling of HTML-Checkboxes and
(dynamic) FormBeans result in false values


> If this was an option in the tag, then the user could
choose for himself
> to accept the 'small' risk of incompatible browers, i.e.
>
> shadowcheckboxes=true
>
> This would be a very nice addition to the tag libraries as
it is one of
> the more confusing initial aspects of learning struts.
Also,
> non-reseting checkboxes is a deterent to reuse of forms
with checkboxes,
> as you are forcing the assumption of every checkbox being
on the jsp
> page.
>
> Edgar
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:30 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Bug 12573] - Handling of HTML-Checkboxes
and
> > (dynamic) FormBeans result in false values
> >
> >
> > That may be how some browsers submit the form but AFAIK
there
> > is nothing in
> > the HTTP spec that guarantees this ordering.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Emmanuel Feller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: "Struts Developers List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: Re: [Bug 12573]  -     Handling of
HTML-Checkboxes
> > and (dynamic)
> > >FormBeans result in false values
> > >Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:24:53 +0100
> > >
> > >Hi James,
> > >
> > >We use this such of thing on projects in production for
> > >years and we do not have any bug related. We tested
this
> > >with IE, Mozilla and Opera but it should work with any
browser.
> > >When the form is submitted, the file is parsed and the
> > >checkbox and the input are in lexical order.
> > >
> > >I will submit a patch and committers will be able to
test.
> > >
> > >I understand the process for bug solving, escuse my
mistake. next i
> > >will use bugzilla :).
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Emmanuel
> > >
> > >Emmanuel Feller
> > >Cap Gemini Ernst & Young
> > >+33 2 51 17 35 00 poste 37 16
> > >+33 6 23 34 63 39
> > >
> > >----- Message d'origine -----
> > >De : "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >A : "'Struts Developers List'"
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Envoye : vendredi 14 fevrier 2003 16:52
> > >Objet : RE: [Bug 12573] - Handling of HTML-Checkboxes
and
> > >(dynamic) FormBeans result in false values
> > >
> > >
> > >I don't believe that will work since you are not
guaranteed any order
> > >for form fields submitted.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >James Mitchell
> > >Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
> > >http://www.open-tools.org/
> > >
> > >"The man who does not read good books has no advantage
over
> > the man who
> > >cannot read them."
> > >- Mark Twain (1835-1910)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Emmanuel Feller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:45 AM
> > > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > > Subject: Re:[Bug 12573] - Handling of
HTML-Checkboxes and
> > > > (dynamic) FormBeans result in false values
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm quite new to the ML, struts and ASF projects, so
> > >please
> > > > escuse my poor english (i'm french). If it is not
the way
> > >to
> > > > submit a solve the bug please redirect me. :)
> > > >
> > > > I have a solution for the chekbox missing in the
request when not
> > > > checked : the taglib should generate after the
checkbox
> > input tag an
> > > > hidden input tag wich have the same name than the
> > chekbox. So if the
> > > > checkbox is checked, the first value in the request
is
> > 'yes' (from
> > > > the checkbox)
> > >and
> > > > ignore the second one, else the value of parameter
is
> > 'no' from the
> > > > hidden input.
> > > >
> > > > I hope it helps. I'll submit to the list a patch for
the
> > taglib on
> > > > monday if needed.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Emmanuel
> > > >
> > > > Emmanuel Feller
> > > > Cap Gemini Ernst & Young
> > > > +33 2 51 17 35 00 poste 37 16
> > > > +33 6 23 34 63 39
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >-----------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>-----------------------------------------------------------
-
> > >---------
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>-----------------------------------------------------------
----------
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
____________________________________________________________
_____
> > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with
MSN 8.
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to