Redundant only if you're using the appropriate prerequisites. As a practical matter, not everyone can migrate as quickly as they might like. In the 2.x series, the JSTL argument would have some technical merit. In the 1.x series, it is not applicable to everyone in our target base.

Of course, we are all entitled to decide what we each will and won't commit (which is why we like to have multiple committers).

Happily, we each are entitled to choose which activities are most productive and the best use of our own volunteer time. If someone comes along who aggressively pursues patches to the elder JSP codebase, we could end up with even more. =:0)

-T.

David Graham wrote:
I personally won't commit any changes that overlap with *standard* technologies like JSTL or JSF when it is finalized. I think it's counterproductive and time consuming to support a redundant code base.

David


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to