DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17750>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17750 bean:message could be more power with little effort ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 19:55 ------- bean:write doesn't meet my needs for two reasons. First, I take advantage of the arg0 though arg4 parameters and there is no way to do this in bean:write. I only used arg0 in my example to keep things simple. Second, the only way I can think to get bean:write to take more than one parameter is to use an array of Objects as the name attribute in bean:write. If you follow the code path of the WriteTag.formatValue(Object) you'll see that no formatting can be applied unless the value is an instaceof java.lang.Number or java.util.Date which Object[] is a subclass of neither. The enhancement in Bug #14150 I suggested would make this possible but it was marked as WONTFIX. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
