When there is a patch that we could use later, I am noting the version referenced in the comments field and adding the patch keyword.
-T.
Martin Cooper wrote:
"Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been tagging the "resolved laters" for the "unknown" build and then indicating a milestone.
The problem with this is that we don't know what version it was reported against, and therefore don't know what version to attempt to reproduce the problem with. If someone goes to try to reproduce it with the latest code base, and it doesn't happen, then we don't know if that's because the code changed since the version it was reported against, or whether there's some other factor involved that needs to be investigated.
Knowing what version the problem was reported against is important, and I don't agree with zapping it out just so that we don't have to reopen LATER bugs. If we're going to continue to do this, then we should be going back and reinstating the original value later. That being the case, we might as well use LATER for what it's meant for, and leave Version for what it's meant for.
And yes, I know that I can look at the Bug Activity to see the original version, but unless I'm mistaken, there's no way to run a report against past values of a field.
-- Martin Cooper
validatorThis gets them off the list of things we need to handle for the current iteration, but does not force us to go through the red tape of "reopening it" later.
-T.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18094>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18094
validate method on ValidatorForm should use mapping.getName as key to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER
-- Ted Husted, Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Ted Husted, Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
