RequestHandler?

Quoting David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> That doesn't fit well with method parameter semantics because it's not a 
> noun.  You can't say, "I'm passing a RequestProcessing to myMethod".
> 
> David
> 
> 
> >From: "Andrew Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: composable RequestProcessor
> >Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 17:37:59 +0100
> >
> >RequestProcessing?
> >
> >Andrew Harris
> >
> >On 30 May 2003 at 7:39, David Graham wrote:
> >
> > > >In the 1.x series, we could do something like declare a
> > > >RequestProcessorInterface, have the existing concrete classes
> implement
> > > >that, and then change the underlying code to use interface
> >instead, and
> > > >avoid any external API changes.
> > >
> > > I'm fine with changing this in 1.x but not with a name like
> > > RequestProcessorInterface or IRequestProcessor.  We need to
> >think up a
> > > better name but we can leave that discussion for post 1.2 or post
> > > suggestions to the enhancement ticket.  It would also be good to
> >change
> > > ExceptionHandler and the various config objects to interfaces as
> >well but
> > > that may need to wait for 2.0.
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-- 
Kris Schneider <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D.O.Tech       <http://www.dotech.com/>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to