As I opened my big mouth on this topic, I'll also keep a special eye out for any new bugs or patches that come in.
Tiles & Nested tags seem to be popular areas for issues to occur though, and I'm not particularly familiar with those. Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: August 31, 2003 3:02 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Short terms plans > > > On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:31:22 -0400 > > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Short terms plans > > > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > Sorry for the late response on this ... it seems like weekends are the > > > only time I get to play with open source code any more :-(. > > > > I hear that, brother! =:0) The catch-as-catch-can thing isn't working > > for me anymore either, so I think I'll take my own advice > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/faqs/helping.html#corp > > > > and block out a regular time for open source development and call it > > part of the work week. I really want to Bugzilla sorted-out and fill in > > some of the remaining gaps in the documentation. > > > > Since we have a wiki now, I thought it might be helpful to setup a short > > term plans page. I took the liberty (surprise!) of adding some notes > > people have made on the list or in Bugzilla recently. > > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?action=edit&id=Struts > ShortTermPlans > > > > I just added "final cleanups to commons-resources" to my list. > > > Also, I setup a Job Jar page on the Wiki > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?StrutsJobJar > > > > I'd like to add this item as well: > > > > * <b>A maintainer for the conventional Struts taglibs package is > > needed.</b> If you are motivated, self-starting developer who is > > actively using these tags, groks the Apache Way, and can spare the time, > > please take a look at the outstanding reports for the taglibs > > components, and start submitting patches for our consideration. > > > > +1. Lots of people rely on these tags, and will for a long time. > > > But thought I should see if we have consensus on this first. > > > > At one time, we were not pursuing the conventional tags because we did > > not want to steer people away from JSTL. But now that we have an > > actively-supported JSTL tag library, it may be time to fish around for > > someone to actively maintain this package on behalf of the segment of > > our Community who need, or choose, to use these tags. > > > > Usually, I would suggest we let nature take its course and see if a > > taglib developer appears spontaneously. But, I think we may have given > > the community the impression that we are antagonistic towards these > > tags, and it may be prudent to take affirmative action to correct that > > impression. > > > > -Ted. > > > > Craig > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
