>>At 11:29 PM -0500 1/15/04, Ted Husted wrote:
>>My only comment is that it seems we're throwing a lot of technology at
>> a problem that could be solved by putting an empty DynaActionForm in
>> the Struts config, and just referring to that. Perhaps something like:
>>
>> <form-bean name="buttonForm"
>type="org.apache.struts.action.DynaForm" />
>
>That doesn't solve the problem if you want to use html:input tags when
>you haven't created the form-beans yet. That's kind of a corner case,
>but we are gradually getting non-developers who can write JSPs and tags
>ok but haven't yet learned struts-config syntax. Eventually I hope
>that they will, and then this might not be so important.
>
>From the writ, page 172? My favorite romance novel :)
<form-bean name="buttonForm" type="org.apache.struts.action.DynaForm">
<form-property name="value" type="java.util.TreeMap" />
</form-bean>
<html:text propety='value("key")'/>
<bean:write name="buttonForm" property='value("key")' />
>I still prefer to err on the side of permissiveness -- a blank form
>rather than a stack trace.
>
>Joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
