Be sure to put the CVS TAGS in the refernce license.txt so it will
add them automatically, at least the python version was ok with that.


-Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Sundling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 11:27 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan
> 
> I woke up earlier than planned (I'm on a strange sleep schedule) and 
> Robert Leland got me a copy of the tools, which saved me a bunch of time 
> since my own tool was only 40% done.  I used the java one, since python 
> is the one LAMP language I don't know.  I fixed one of the problems in 
> the java tool README and another not mentioned. 
> 
> I still have to test the CheckStyle maven reports and read and/or parse 
> through the 38K line patch file to make sure everything is OK.  I 
> estimate I'll finish about 5:30pm PST today, so unless the midnight "my 
> time" is england or something I should finish well before the cutoff, 
> leaving some a couple hours for a committer to check it out.
> 
> Paul Sundling
> 
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> 
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Paul Sundling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 7:52 AM
> >>To: Struts Developers List
> >>Subject: Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan
> >>
> >>
> >>David Karr emailed me, so I'll take care of the licenses this weekend.
> >>I have a social engagement today, so I'll take care of it on sunday.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Thanks for doing this, Paul. One caveat: The tag/freeze for 1.2.0 happens
> >tonight at midnight my time. Since there are often a few tweaks that happen
> >after the tag and before the release itself, you might want to hold off
> >until the release is uploaded (or I send a "Houston, we have lift-off"
> >message) before updating your source tree.
> >
> >(It turns out that I have a social engagement today also, so I can't take
> >care of this before tag/freeze either.)
> >
> >--
> >Martin Cooper
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Paul Sundling
> >>
> >>David Graham wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>--- Paul Sundling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>One possible question is from the new boilerplate:
> >>>>
> >>>> Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> >>>>
> >>>>Is it just "The Apache Software Foundation", like in the 1.1 license?
> >>>>That would be my guess.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>I think that's correct.  The documentation uses that string in the
> >>>examples.
> >>>
> >>>David
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>The one reference to Struts in the previous license version was related
> >>>>to the section on use of the trademark name.  I think that's dealt with
> >>>>in a more general way in the new license.
> >>>>
> >>>>Paul Sundling
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>David Graham wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>The exact license details can be found here:
> >>>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>David
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--- "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Does this involve changing the file header comment to replace the
> >>>>>>existing license with the new license?  That's something that I can
> >>>>>>relatively easily script in elisp macros.  If someone can confirm
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>that's
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>>all this is, and show me exactly what needs to change, I can get that
> >>>>>>done this weekend.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 12:12 PM
> >>>>>>To: Struts Developers List
> >>>>>>Subject: Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>At 1:49 PM -0600 2/20/04, Joe Germuska wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Just a few things:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>                  
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>* What about the new Apache license? Technically, it doesn't need
> >>>>>>>>>to  change if we release before March 1st, but we're mighty close
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>                  
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>to
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>that,  so
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>perhaps we should switch now?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>                  
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>+1 from me too; wasn't someone offering to do it a few weeks ago?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>I should amend this: + 0 from me; I don't have time to do it now, and
> >>>>>>probably won't soon enough that I'd want to delay 1.2.0 until it gets
> >>>>>>done.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Joe
> >>>>>>--
> >>>>>>Joe Germuska
> >>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>http://blog.germuska.com
> >>>>>>     "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>the usual way.  This happens to us all the time with computers, and
> >>>>>>nobody thinks of complaining."
> >>>>>>           -- Jef Raskin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>__________________________________
> >>>>>Do you Yahoo!?
> >>>>>Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
> >>>>>http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
> >>>>>
> >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>__________________________________
> >>>Do you Yahoo!?
> >>>Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
> >>>http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
> >>>
> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to