I didn't take offense at what you said. I just wanted
to acknowledge it was something I wanted to do and
eventually things would be more reusable, but I
haven't had time to address this issue as the code has
changed. I would like to have things separated more
with layers and interfaces so other people can use the
pieces they want or put in a different interface for
the validators so it could be used on other platforms
besides Struts.
David
--- "Cook, Levi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I would like to emphasize that I truly do not intend
> to criticize or
> belittle your work. I really do appreciate and
> respect your efforts to give
> Struts a boost.
>
> My only agenda is simply trying to expand the
> flexibility of our tools and
> enhance there ability to be learned and reused.
> Maybe I'm not doing that
> yet, but its where I'm trying to go :)
>
> Respectfully,
> Levi Cook
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Winterfeldt
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:17 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: server-side, java-based validation
> rules for struts..
> >
> >
> > I haven't had time yet to reorganize the code to
> > separate out validations into pure boolean
> validation
> > methods. The interface that is there now wasn't
> the
> > original one and has evolved over time. When I
> have
> > free time, I've normally focused on adding
> > functionality over reorganizing the source code.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
