David Winterfeldt wrote:
> I don't know. I could go either way. I think it
> makes sense having the ValidatorForm in
> org.apache.struts.action.
+1 on org.apache.struts.action if that's what you want to do.
> Are there any issues with breaking backwards
> compatibility? I'm for replacing the validator
> version for the current since iterating throught the
> errors further encourages formatting to be in the
> view. If we do replace the old tag, would it still be
> somewhere for people to access the old tag that
> migrate from Struts 1.0 to Struts 1.1? Possibly
> called html:errorsOld or old-html:errors. Or the new
> one could be html:errorsIterator.
Craig setup a 1.1 DTD so we could make changes there without affecting
the 1.0 users. I guess we need a similar strategy for the taglibs
themselves. If we made the old taglib available as struts-html-10, then
they could keep compatible just by changing the web.xml reference, or
something.
-Ted.
