Idea...

There was just that too and fro in "additional properties needed on 
html:image..." bug in that there was the argument over what to support 
and what not to support... if there was a standard property (ie: 
"freetext", "freeform", "uglytext" or something) where developers could 
add a string to be included in the tag as they provide it (with an extra 
space at the front and back to avoid collisions).

If a developer wants to include something to be rendered for one reason 
or another, Struts not supporting it or otherwise, they can without 
issue and code hacks that will have to be re-done the next version of 
the tag, tld etc...

It means that the html:image and html:text can do whatever and the 
developer can still get the width, height and wrap stuff that he needs 
for nice formatting.

Probably not *proper* for all the die -hards out there... but certainly 
useable, especially for html creatives that seek that extra level of 
control that Struts hasn't been around yet, doesn't want to or whatever.

Just an idea.


Arron.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to