Yes, I am interested in exploring open souce solution for single SignOn.

I am watching Liberty Alliance, while internally develop solution based on
JAAS, OpenLDAP, and Kerberos.

BaTien

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandra Cann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:09 AM
Subject: Single Signon (was role based actions)


> Batien et al,
>
> I wonder if members of this list would be interested in collaborating with
> the Expresso community on single sign-on features via our opensource
> listserv or the Expresso Users Forum (Single Sign-on topic).
>
> The following document url is a summation of a detailed discussion on
single
> sign on from our open source listserv which you might find interesting
since
> Expresso utilizes Struts. (There is also a link to the open source
archives
> on the home page.)
>
> http://www.jcorporate.com/econtent/Content.do?state=resource&resource=615
> (you will need to be registered at www.jcorporate.com and login to view).
>
> cheers
> Sandra
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dr. BaTien Duong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 7:53 PM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: Re: role based actions
> >
> >
> > Brandon:
> >
> > I am interested in your code as we are working on Struts, ldap, and Java
> > single SignOn technology.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Phase Communcations" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:43 PM
> > Subject: RE: role based actions
> >
> >
> > > One last thing. When a security check happens and the user is
> > forwarded to
> > > the login. Their desired destination is stored and once their
> > security is
> > > verified they are forwarded on to that page.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Phase Communcations [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:40 PM
> > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > Subject: RE: role based actions
> > >
> > >
> > > In my code I extended the action class (not the action servlet) and
> > required
> > > that group access be established on a per extended action class basis.
> > >
> > > Defined within my struts-config file in my action class
> > definitions I use
> > an
> > > extra attribute(s):
> > >
> > > <set-property property="group" value="agroup" />
> > >
> > > There is a security check within the extended action class that uses
an
> > > extended ActionMapping to retrieve the "group" property and checks it
> > > against the users information (in a database). If the user
> > belongs to the
> > > proper group or one of the groups defined then it allows them access
to
> > that
> > > action/area with their assigned role and permissions. If the security
> > check
> > > fails, they are routed to a login page.
> > >
> > > The other thing that it does is it stores role and permission
> > information
> > in
> > > a bean so that security information can be used to define the view as
> > well.
> > >
> > > I opted out of the container managed security because I was
> > working under
> > > Tomcat 3.2.3 and am trying to create a more independent security
model.
> > This
> > > model also works well for me because I use the command line url
> > format for
> > > mapping to my action classes and none of my views are available but
> > through
> > > action classes (except index.jsp).
> > >
> > > I would be happy to share my code if anyone is interested. I think it
is
> > > flexible enough that it could be incorporated into an ldap
> > system. I have
> > > been confeing with a colleague who is working on struts interacting
with
> > > ldap for security and profile management.
> > >
> > > Anyways if you like the idea of security being managed from the action
> > class
> > > and don't expose your views but through action mappings. This might be
a
> > > good solution
> > >
> > > Brandon Goodin
> > > Phase Web and Multimedia
> > > P (406) 862-2245
> > > F (406) 862-0354
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.phase.ws
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: craigmcc@localhost [mailto:craigmcc@localhost]On Behalf Of Craig
> > > R. McClanahan
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:16 AM
> > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: role based actions
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:27:52 -0500
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: role based actions
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am a struts "newbie" so I apologize in advance if this topic has
> > already
> > > > beaten to death...
> > > >
> > > >                  ~~~
> > > >
> > > > I noticed role-based actions on the pending tasks list.
> > >
> > > Adding this (and a few of the other recent enhancements) to
> > Struts 1.1 is
> > > definitely on *my* list.  I will have some time to do so
> > between Christmas
> > > and New Years.
> > >
> > > Craig McClanahan
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone comment on the status and scope of this effort? (link was
a
> > > dead
> > > > end)
> > > >
> > > > The description points to role being driven by security,
> > seems the role
> > > will
> > > > be detected and then dispatches to the proper action? points
> > to assoc'd
> > > form
> > > > through config?
> > > >
> > > > Is this intended to be used for personalization to the extent where
a
> > > person
> > > > of one role gets a different view, can user customize their view?
> > > >
> > > > Does this provide a place holder for that kind of functionality v.
any
> > > > particular "built in" functionality?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, sorry if the questions were a little obtuse.
> > > >
> > > > -Rick Vaillancourt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to