DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7805>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7805 Methods with Protected instead of Public scope Summary: Methods with Protected instead of Public scope Product: Struts Version: 1.1 Beta 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: Other Component: Controller AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shouldn't the methods such as execute() in the ExceptionHandler be public instead of protected? If I extend the RequestProcessor and override the processExceptions method, I get a compile error because my RequestProcessor is in a different package (and it should be) than org.apache.struts.action. Notice that the process() method in RequestProcessor is public so that if you extend the ActionServlet in a different package, you can still call the process method because it's public. Chuck -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
