DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9624>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9624 RequestActionMapping init-param to ActionServlet Summary: RequestActionMapping init-param to ActionServlet Product: Struts Version: 1.1 Beta 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Controller AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Although only deprecated, this does not seem to use the class specified (e.g. org.apache.struts.action.RequestActionMapping). The className alternative does work. I do think it would be great if we could retain this functionality instead of deprecating it, since specifying the className each time seems like a pain. In effect, deprecating this also deprecates RequestActionMapping, since the functionality overlaps with scope="request". Personally, I would vote to retain both. I like the className functionality, but I also like the idea of being able to make a global change. I haven't checked the other init-params yet. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
