DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7361>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7361 Performance Enhancement to MessageResouce.getMessage(..) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-06-25 02:25 ------- Marking this bug as "INVALID" because it appears to suggest a change to an abstract method in MessageResources. Do you instead think this change should be applied to PropertyMessageResources (the default implementation)? If so, you should consider those performance gains in light of the fact that your code isn't synchronized. MessageResources could be the subject of high contention in a (multi-threaded) servlet environment, so it doesn't seem like a good tradeoff. And, then, there's the fact that you can register your own implementation of MessageResources that behaves according to your suggestion below if that's what you want. It just doesn't seem like it belongs in the distribution... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
