At 3:30 PM -0400 2002/07/01, Hal Deadman wrote:
>Those changes sound fine but is "forward" a good name for the new action
>attribute? I think inputforward provides a slightly better description of
>what the attribute is used for. I have always thought that it was not clear
>that the attributes "name", "input", "validate", and "scope", all refer to
>the action form (or at least they only apply if there is a form) but they
>are attributes of the action. I think adding forward would be similarly
>confusing.
For what it's worth, this was my first reaction as well.
"inputForward" was the same alternative that came to my mind.
Joe
--
--
* Joe Germuska { [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
"It's pitiful, sometimes, if they've got it bad. Their eyes get
glazed, they go white, their hands tremble.... As I watch them I
often feel that a dope peddler is a gentleman compared with the man
who sells records."
--Sam Goody, 1956
tune in posse radio: <http://www.live365.com/stations/289268>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
