DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7751>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7751

DynaValidatorForm throws NullPointerException and ClassCastException

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-07-10 18:38 -------
I have had the same problem, and Joe has right the dynamic="true" attribute on 
the form-bean element solves the issue. But I think it's a better solution if 
change some lines in the FormBeanConfig:

Index: FormBeanConfig.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-
struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config/FormBeanConfig.java,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 FormBeanConfig.java
--- FormBeanConfig.java 9 Jul 2002 23:57:37 -0000       1.6
+++ FormBeanConfig.java 10 Jul 2002 18:34:57 -0000
@@ -152,8 +152,14 @@
             throw new IllegalStateException("Configuration is frozen");
         }
         this.type = type;
-        if ("org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm".equals(type)) {
-            this.dynamic = true;
+        try {
+            Class formClazz = Class.forName(type);
+            Class dynaClazz = Class.forName
("org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm");
+            if (dynaClazz.isAssignableFrom(formClazz)) {
+                this.dynamic = true;
+            }
+        } catch (Exception e) {
+            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Form type can't be found");
         }
     }

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to