Multi-row validation works in the current release, although you need to
design your rows right. In particular, you should define a bean which
holds all the values in a given row, and define the form to use an array of
the bean. They you can validate on individual properties. Here's an
example from a client's app:
<form-bean name="dependentlistForm"
type="com.benefit.association.struts.forms.ValidatorForm">
<form-property name="dependents"
type="com.benefit.association.Dependent[]"
initial="{'','','','','','','','','','',''}"/>
</form-bean>
<form name="dependentlistForm">
<field property="dob" indexedListProperty="dependents" depends="date">
<arg0 key="dependentlistForm.dob.label"/>
</field>
</form>
James
At 03:40 PM 8/13/2002, you wrote:
>Subject: Re: Last Few Bugs for Struts 1.1-beta-2
>From: Vic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ===
>This remains open?
>V
>
>Vic C wrote:
> > Bug 8798
> >
> > and the bug has an attached CVS source code to fix it.
> >
> > When you do multi row update (which my clients do a lot) you also want
> > multi row validation to work. Not sure if it is a show stoper.
> >
> > (so then clients used the "custom" jar with attached CVS source code
> > fix, not ideal)
> >
> > I pinged David way back on it.
> >
> > (also, next build of basicPortal will use the newer nightly jars, things
> > seem to work well with the new JSTL jars, and I am going arround to my
> > client to bump them to the newer nightly jars to see if anything shakes)
> >
> > hth,
> >
> > Vic
> >
> >
> > Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> >
> >> It looks like we're on the home stretch for fixing the remaining bugs
> >> standing in the way of a 1.1-beta-2 release. Could someone (especially
> >> David) take a look at the outstanding bug reports against validator (both
> >> here and on commons)? If the proposed patches look reasonable but you
> >> don't have time to commit them, just add a note on the bug reports and
> >> someone else can do the grunt work.
> >>
> >> Then, we just need someone to be release manager again. Martin, would
> >> you
> >> be willing to do the honors for another round?
> >>
> >> Craig
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
