DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10599>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10599 GenericValidator.isDate NullPointerException ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-28 03:24 ------- Randy, 2 Items First off It is always best to correspond using Buzilla rather than direct e-mail. That way if I get hit by a car, or better yet win 10,000,000 dollars ;-) ! and go on vacation for a year, there will always be a paper trail to follow. If you don't have access to diff then attach the modified file, specify the version it is based on to a followup of the Bugzilla. More detail is always better than not enough. I will create a patch. Second why is the package name: com.wintecinc.struts.validation.GenericValidator.isDate ^^^^^^^^^^^ Shouldn't this be org.apache ? Randy Bielby wrote: Rob, I would love to go to 1.1b. Unfortunately it has that nasty 'b' attached to the release. The group that is supporting our components such as Struts, XML parsers, etc will not allow so-called beta software. So, I'm stuck with the Struts 1.0.x versions for now, and the future (moving will be a chore). I can deal with the bug myself if necessary. Especially if there won't be any future releases of 1.0.x. Yes, I would like the 1.0.3 if it becomes available. Thanks Randy Bielby p.s. I hope this is the correct email to respond to you. I could not find another one. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
