I changed the permissions on README.html, but there are two older 
versions that are set to 644 that Craig could change (and remove) sometime.

-T.


Craig R. McClanahan wrote:

> 
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> 
> 
>>Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:29:53 +0200
>>From: Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Packaging error
>>
>>
>>Craig,
>>
>>Thanks for the immediate response. If possible, I would like the
>>warning text to include the following.
>>
>>    The problem is not caused by log4j but with the particular way
>>    Struts-1.1-b2 was built. The problem will be solved in future releases
>>    of Struts.
>>
>>
> 
> Be happy to, but Ted's got the permissions on the README.html file set to
> 644 :-<.  Ted, can you please add a clarification on this (and fix your
> umask to 002 so that file permissions come out as 664)?
> 
> 
>>On an unrelated register, do you have the slides of your
>>"Recommendations for Java-Based Web Application Architectures" session
>>(ApacheCon 2001) in a format other than sdd?
>>
>>
> 
> Powerpoint and StarOffice/OpenOffice formats:
> 
>   http://jakarta.apache.org/~craigmcc/apachecon-2001-architecture.ppt
>   http://jakarta.apache.org/~craigmcc/apachecon-2001-architecture.sdd
> 
> Craig
> 
> 
>>At 08:47 11.09.2002 -0700, you wrote:
>>
>>>Ceki,
>>>
>>>It was nothing wrong with Log4J -- the person who built the Struts release
>>>built commons-logging.jar from scratch, but without Log4J in his build
>>>environment (so the Log4J wrapper classes weren't included).
>>>
>>>The final Struts release will include final releases of the Commons
>>>packages it relies on, and we'll verify that everything is there.
>>>
>>>Craig
>>>
>>>
>>>On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:33:36 +0200
>>>>From: Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>Subject: Packaging error
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>At http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/release/v1.1-b2/
>>>>one can read the following message:
>>>>
>>>>   Log4J Users Please Note - A packaging error has been uncovered that
>>>>   caused the copy of commons-logging.jar included in the Struts 1.1 Beta
>>>>   2 release to be built incorrectly. If you are using Log4J for your
>>>>   logging needs, you will need to download the Commons Logging 1.0.1
>>>>   release (convenient links are provided in the logging directory) and
>>>>   replace your copy of commons-logging.jar with the one found in the
>>>>   1.0.1 release.
>>>>
>>>>What causes this packaging error? Could someone clarify this?  Thank you
>>>>in advance,
>>>>
>>--
>>Ceki
>>
>>TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
>>conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
>>others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 


-- 
Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY US
co-author, Java Web Development with Struts
Order it today:
<http://husted.com/struts/book.html>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to