DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12819] New: - org.apache.struts.util.AppException should have protected properties instead of private properties

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12819>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12819

org.apache.struts.util.AppException should have protected properties instead of 
private properties

           Summary: org.apache.struts.util.AppException should have
                    protected properties instead of private properties
           Product: Struts
           Version: Nightly Build
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Controller
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


org.apache.struts.util.AppException should have protected properties instead of 
private properties

this would allow any application to overide the AppException class and both:
- benefit from the default ExceptionHandler behaviour
- implement its own exception handling, inheriting from AppException

and by the way, maybe it could also implement the following constructor, to be 
fully compliant with ActionError's constructors:

public AppException(String key, Object[] values) {
  super(key);
  error = new ActionError(key, values);
}

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>