I think you're right-- it's best to keep all the info about a bug in one
place.

What else could we associate with the bug to help out committers?  Is there
a preferred format for unit tests?  Struts has a bunch of different facets,
maybe there would be several different formats that would make sense.

Fears about regression issues are well-founded.  What do people think about
including a version of the example application that uses the patch, and
updating the example as a way of maintaining a "reference" integration
testbed?  That way, you'd be able to assess the impact of patches on each
other to some degree.  Just a thought.

-----Original Message-----
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Applying patches




On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Taylor, Jason wrote:

> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:23:39 -0700
> From: "Taylor, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Applying patches
>
> I suppose you could log a bug that refers to a patch of another bug, if
that
> isn't too weird.  That way, you could vote for a bug you want fixed and
you
> could vote for a patch that fixes it separately and the severity of the
> problem could be tracked along with the relative confidence people have in
> proposed solution.  The trick would be making it easy to get rid of the
> patch votes when a bug is resolved.  Anyone out there a bugzilla wizard?
>

Votes go away automatically when an issue is FIXED, so that's not a
problem.  I can also adjust the vote parameters on Struts bug reports,
which are currently:

* Maximum votes per person = 6

* Maximum votes per person on a single bug = 3

if we want to.

Personally, I'd prefer that alternative patches to the same problem be
attached to the same bug report -- it's a lot easier to keep things
straight that way -- and arguments for or against particular fix
approaches can be made in your notes on the bug report and/or on
STRUTS-DEV.

Craig


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Applying patches
>
>
> - Maybe we should start a discussion on using the Voting in bugzilla?
> Although
> that is meant for prioritizing
> - Or maybe a "+1 I tried it" in the comments to help committers feel more
> comfortable.
>
>
> I am one of those people that is trying to be more active on the list and
in
> the code.  If I can help in this type of area by trying patches and voting
> for
> ones that work, that would be great.
>
>
>
>
> rom: Taylor, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Applying patches
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:43:48 -0700
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>       boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C26BCD.98088C80"
>
>
> Maybe we can come up with some process of reviewing patches so that
> struts-dev subscribers can take care of some of the quality control tasks
> and committers can review the reviews, if that makes sense.  Struts is so
> good at divvying up work between people and creating specialized tasks
that
> somehow make up a development process, it seems appropriate that the
process
> of managing the framework itself should benefit from similar
specialization.
>
>
> Is there anything we can do to help committers review patches?  Maybe
people
> could post their own digests of the bug list that prioritize bugs, scope
the
> issues and give their opinions on the possible solutions or the posted
> patches that are available.  We could also find bugs that we recommend be
> dismissed to get them off the list.  Maybe morale would improve if there
was
> a sense that the effort required was actually *not* infinite.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to