What "thing extending OBJECT?!" are you talking about, Eddie? Who, what, where, when?
At 07:12 PM 10/8/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Before I go looking stupid in front of folks I don't know, I prefer to >first look stupid in front of people I do :-) > >So - what's up with this thing extending OBJECT?! The compiler doesn't >track that really well! I just noticed because I coded some stuff I knew >should throw exceptions - expecting the compiler to tell me exactly what >it was I needed to catch (I know, I know - I was feeling lazy) ... and - >it *didn't*! I don't think I like that :-/ I suppose this is a prime >example of why you familiarize yourself with the Javadocs before using a >class ... or keep the javadoc up while you code even ... > >Dare I post to commons-dev? That seems like ... a "really big thing" - am >I wrong? I'm hoping someone can set me straight. I know some of you guys >follow the commons stuff ... very rigorously. ... why OBJECT? Exception >wasn't good enough for them? ... I just don't get it. > >Thanks for being my shining light! (D'oh! Hope that's not a train coming!) > >(It just *feels* so *wrong*!) > >-- >Eddie Bush > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
