DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13638>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13638 add Config Factory ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-16 15:38 ------- Hi, Please IGNORE the first attachement (10/16/02 10:33). Actually I've got a working solution. I only modified the file ConfigRuleSet. Two files was added : - org/apache/struts/config/ConfigFactory.java - org/apache/struts/config/LocalStrings.properties Factory usage : The class ConfigFactory extends AbstractObjectCreationFactory (from commons- digester) and provide all config classes (except PlugIn). The user can override this factory and provide new config classes, but theses classes must be compatible with default struts config classes. ------- Usage : ------- Simply override method like this : package com.cross.example.config; import org.apache.struts.config.ConfigFactory; public class MyConfigFactory extends ConfigFactory { public Class getActionConfigClass() { return MyActionConfig.class; } } --------------- Configuration : --------------- Simply configure like this : <struts-config factoryClass="com.cross.example.config.MyConfigFactory"> ... </struts-config> -------------------------------------- I will attach a patch for ConfigRuleSet and the two new files. There is only one ambigous point, the ApplicationConfig.getActionMappingClass and the type="..." attribute. ??? This solution use it but it's not pretty elegant ? -emmanuel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
