> I wasn't suggesting that was the way it had be.
> Doing that would have *all* validator-related "things" living under o.a.s.v though.

I really was agreeing with you, that it --could-- be beneficial.
I didn't feel strongly one way or the other.
It is possible that when Java Server Faces comes that having it in a different
package, would encourage its reuse.

>> Eddie spoke and it was so:
>
>LOL! You're killing me, Rob!

Welcome to the club. Ok, Now I am through hazing you :-D !



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to