How about <cringe/> an alternate DTD?
James Turner wrote:
At 07:31 PM 10/16/2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> One bug under Struts that should really be addressed in the base
code is
> the question of specifying alternate resource bundles forms and
fields (bug
> #10868). As I understand it, this will cause problems for
Validator with
> sub-apps under Struts. Should I try to tackle it?
>
Please do!
Ok, but I can't think of a clean way to handle it.
Here's the issue:
The base Validator doesn't deal with resource bundles (or errors
messages for that matter) at all. It's the validator Framework that
does all that stuff. So putting bundle= support into the base
Validator DTD for forms isn't very clean, since it required putting
Struts-specific stuff into the Validator DTD (and adding a bundle
property to the Field class)
Any thoughts on how we can implement this in a way that keeps
Validator Struts-neutral?
James
--
Eddie Bush
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
