AFAIK, the only change is the closing / added to struts input tags. All browsers support this for reasons mentioned previously.

I guess I just don't see how this is a serious change and how existing apps behavior would change. In my experience, over 95% of clients use Netscape 4.x+ or IE which both support this grammar. Many other people use Opera which also supports this.

Dave






From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and <html:html>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:03:16 -0700 (PDT)



On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:

> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:24:08 -0600
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and <html:html>
>
> XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need the xhtml attribute for
> the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and older browsers, I think
> the tags should produce it every time. Many people do not use the
> <html:html> tag so it doesn't make sense to require that to use xhtml.
>

I'd rather *not* make this kind of a potentially backwards incompatible
change immediately before a release (unless you make it conditional on the
"xhtml" attribute of the <html:html> tag being true). The problem is that
we have no way to know how many existing Struts apps depend on the current
behavior, and this is a pretty serious change.

I'm all for doing it post-1.1 though.

> David

Craig


>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: HTML, XML, XHTML and <html:html>
> >Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:43:30 -0700
> >
> >I'm a little confused about what's going on with our HTML taglib. I see
> >changes being made so that the tags always output valid XML, regardless of
> >the value of the 'xhtml' attribute of the <html:html> tag.
> >
> >Have we decided that we don't need that attribute any more, and we'll just
> >always output XHTML, or is there a difference that I'm missing between
> >generating XML-compliant HTML and generating XHTML?
> >
> >--
> >Martin Cooper
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> ><mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> ><mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access!
> http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

_________________________________________________________________
Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to