It struck me the other day that the validator could be further integrated
into struts. I'm not sure about my ideas so I want to get your thoughts.
Why should people need to subclass ValidatorActionForm instead of ActionForm
to use the validator? What forms have you built that didn't need
validation?
My idea is that the ValidatorActionForm and ValidatorForm (why are there 2?)
behavior should be included in ActionForm and have those classes removed. I
think this will maintain backward compatibility because if the developer
hasn't defined any validation rules for a form then we could return null
from validate().
Further, we could include validator configuration tags in struts-config.xml
instead of using a plugin. This would signify that validator is an integral
piece of struts that most people want to use (which I believe they do).
This is probably a post 1.1 idea but I thought I'd throw it out here.
What do you think?
David
_________________________________________________________________
Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free! Try MSN.
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
- Re: Validator Integration David Graham
- Re: Validator Integration James Holmes
- Re: Validator Integration Eddie Bush
- Re: Validator Integration Ted Husted
- Re: Validator Integration Ted Husted
- Re: Validator Integration David Graham
- Re: Validator Integration David Graham
- Re: Validator Integration David Graham
- Re: Validator Integration Joe Germuska
- Re: Validator Integration Ted Husted
- Re: Validator Integration David Graham