On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Leland wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:29:24 -0500 > From: Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Tools in Struts [was: Re: Struts At ApacheCon 2002] > > James Holmes wrote: > > Struts Console too. > > > > -james > > > > --- Emmanuel Boudrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>>I think it is time to start packaging tools and > >> > >>generators with Struts to > >> > >>>help the developer > >> > >>Thats a really good initiative > >> > >>Easy Struts will be volunteer ;) > >> > >>-emmanuel > > Would the source reside in jakrata-Struts or just the applications? > The reason I ask is that for speed of evolution it might > be reasonable to keep/place the source code on > SourceForge, in an open community. That way Emmanuel and James could > draw from a seperate pool of developers as THEY saw fit. > (I'll expand on my thinking about the roadmap for post-1.1 when I've had a little more sleep :-). On this specific issue, it can be done either way -- cohosted in the Struts project or separate and just binary inclusion. The only potential problem for the latter approach is license compatibility for the code to be redistributed with Struts (the FSF doesn't feel that GPL is compatible with the Apache software license in this regard, so as a matter of policy Apache projects do not redistribute GPL'd code. > Also then they might combine resources and create a hybrid product. > > I am not opposed to including the source in Jakarta-Struts, just asking > a question. > > -Rob > > Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>