Is there a bug that I can reference (in my writing) for the limitation
that modules can only be used with extension-mapping (*.do) rather than
path-mapping (/do/*)?
If this has been fixed, please let me know.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: Module path-mapping limitation Matt Raible
- Re: Module path-mapping limitation Martin Cooper
- RE: Module path-mapping limitation Matt Raible
- Re: Module path-mapping limitation Ted Husted