DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15499>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15499 Validator does not successfully validate empty date fields. (#10349 revisited) ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-19 00:10 ------- The only reason I'm a little nervous about this is that if anyone every starts using the value returned from the Validator functions for anything other than validity checking (i.e., to use it as a meaningful value), this would result in blank dates being interpretted as today's date. All these problems came about because (in the past) the validator functions were changed from being straight booleans to returning arbitrary values. Personally, I think that was a mistake. As the current default maintainer of Commons Validator, I'd appreciate input/advise on how people think this should be handled. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
