Re: [VOTE] Declare Struts 1.1b3 as Struts 1.1 RC1

[David Graham]

The only added attribute was "cdata" that defaults to true on the javascript tag. I'd like to see this included in the release because it rounds out the xhtml functionality.

As I've said before, without it, the js validation becomes useless under xhtml and I think the case is good for letting people choose which way they want to hide the javascript.

If you're running your pages through an xml parser then use the cdata section, if you want your pages to work as is in browsers then use a comment. Both methods work and neither violates the xhtml spec. It's about choice.

We have yet to hear back from Martin if he is vetoing this change. If he does, then I'll remove the attribute and always put a cdata section around the javascript in xhtml mode. Obviously, I and other xhtml users would be dissapointed.

Dave

From: Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Declare Struts 1.1b3 as Struts 1.1 RC1
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 12:05:08 -0500

David Graham wrote:

+1

Didn't David add the cdata/comments to the Javascript Tag that he and Martin were talking about
on Thursday. It seemed that there was still disagreement that was a good thing ?
Would those end up in the RC1 from the head of the CVS tree or are we voting on the
STRUTS_1_1_B3 tag to become directly RC1



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>