That would be 16885, I assume? > -----Original Message----- > From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Bug 16685 > > In reference to Ted's note on the latest release plan, Dr. Validator has > looked at 16685 and it appears to be invalid based on my test.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]