That would be 16885, I assume?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bug 16685
> 
> In reference to Ted's note on the latest release plan, Dr. Validator
has
> looked at 16685 and it appears to be invalid based on my test.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to