Did I check those in too soon?  If so, sorry about that.

--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org/

"Beer is the reason we get up each afternoon."
-- Ray McNeill 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 10:36 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Where's RC1?
> 
> 
> Thanks, Rob. It seems there were a lot of changes to that 
> file when James
> checked in his tests, and I didn't want to include those in the RC1
> version. So I checked in a version that had just your change 
> applied to
> the original RC1 version, and then re-checked in the HEAD 
> version so that
> we're back to where we were. I've re-tagged the file for RC1, 
> rebuilt, the
> tests are passing, so keep your fingers crossed!
> 
> --
> Martin Cooper
> 
> 
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Rob Leland wrote:
> 
> > After fixing the DTD reference in the struts-config.xml it 
> appears that
> > all tests passed,
> > unlike the earlier email I sent you.
> >
> > Though I am not sure about the last test since it doesn't 
> seem to report
> > any
> > failure count.
> > ----
> >     [junit] Testcase: testMultiFactory took 2.003 sec
> >     [junit] Testcase: testSingleSharedFactory took 0.1 sec
> >     [junit] Testcase: testUtilBaseEnvironment took 0 sec
> >
> > stop.tomcat.40:
> >      [java] Stopping service Tomcat-Standalone
> > [runservertests] Server stopped !
> >
> > BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> > ----
> > Is it supposed to report the Failures like the other tests
> >     [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time 
> elapsed: 2.113 sec
> >                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > -Rob
> >
> >
> > Martin Cooper wrote:
> >
> > >I know this is the question on the tip of all struts-dev 
> folks' tongues.
> > >First of all, I do apologise for taking so long to get 
> this puppy out. The
> > >tag happened on time, but this has been an insane week at 
> my day job, and
> > >I've had little time to validate the build. (My employer 
> announced an
> > >acquisition on Wednesday, which added some extra hooplah 
> to the week
> > >too...)
> > >
> > >In any case, running the Cactus tests tonight, I have a 
> problem. On all of
> > >the Tomcat versions I've tried so far (4.1.18, 4.0.6, 
> 3.3.1), I get a test
> > >failure in the Tiles tests. The relevant part of the 
> output follows:
> > >
> > >----- cut here -----
> > >    [junit] Testcase: testMultiFactory took 2.544 sec
> > >    [junit] Caused an ERROR
> > >    [junit]
> > 
> >junit.framework.Assert.assertNotSame(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Ob
> > >ject;Ljava/lang/Object;)V
> > >    [junit] at
> > >org.apache.struts.tiles.TestTilesPlugin.testMultiFactory(Test
> > >TilesPlugin.java:236)
> > >    [junit] at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >    [junit]     at
> > >sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAcces
> > >sorImpl.java:39)
> > >    [junit] at
> > >sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMet
> > >hodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> > >    [junit] Testcase: testMultiFactory
> > >----- cut here -----
> > >
> > >There was a flurry of messages on the Cactus tests on this 
> list recently,
> > >but this does not appear to be related to the problems 
> described therein.
> > >
> > >Obviously, I need to determine whether this is a bug that 
> we need to fix
> > >prior to RC1, or if I somehow messed up my system. (I have 
> been able to
> > >run the Cactus tests in the past.) Therefore, I'd 
> appreciate it if someone
> > >else could take the tests for a spin, and let me know the results.
> > >
> > >Thanks!
> > >
> > >--
> > >Martin Cooper
> > >
> > >
> > 
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to