Yes, but in the case of 'indexed' for the html tags, it means (and is documented so) several different things for different tags. The field name is the same, so is the type, but how the tag handler decides what to output depends on the particular subclassed tag.
Ok... so the tags all *use* that attribute and its a valid attribute on all subclasses. That is the important thing. Having a base class implement a setter that only some of the subclasses allow in the TLD is where its not clean. Unfortunately I'd suspect the evil backwards-compatibility-beast to haunt us on refactoring it to be cleaner.
Erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
